top of page

Lessons learned from the 2026 3rd Grade Math STAAR

1 minute ago
3 min read

Using a modified version of the statewide item analysis report, I examined the readiness standards that had less than 60% mastery. Each standard has both an analysis of the items themselves to infer what made them so difficult and instructional implications for educators to ensure a more successful 2026 STAAR test.


Standard

# of items

% mastery

3.4K

1

20

3.7B

2

25.5

3.5B

1

29

3.3F

1

36

3.5E

2

45

3.6A

2

47

3.2A

1

52

Access the slide deck here.


3.4K - 28% overall mastery

solve one-step and two-step problems involving multiplication and division within 100 using strategies based on objects; pictorial models, including arrays, area models, and equal groups; properties of operations; or recall of facts


#26 - 20% correct


Analysis
  • Equation editor removes the surety of multiple choice

  • Students had to divide twice

  • The wording was cumbersome to move from step 1 to step 2

Instructional Implications
  • Draw strip diagrams and write equations for each step

  • Substitute the answer into the representations to check your work

3.7B - 25.5% overall mastery

determine the perimeter of a polygon or a missing length when given perimeter and remaining side lengths in problems


#10 - 20% correct


#21 - 31% correct


Analysis
  • Equation editor removes the surety of multiple choice

  • Both problems assessed the same concept - find the missing side length

    • Roughly 11% of students guessed correctly on #21

  • For #21, 40% chose D (36 - 8)

Instructional Implications
  • Draw a picture to conceptualize perimeter

  • Use a strip diagram with four parts to one whole to solve

  • Remind students that finding a missing side length requires a multi-step solution

Watch the full walkthrough of all 30 items on the 2026 3rd Grade STAAR below.

3.5B - 38% overall mastery

represent and solve one- and two-step multiplication and division problems within 100 using arrays, strip diagrams, and equations


#8 - 29% correct


Analysis
  • Students had to multiply twice

  • When students multiply 2 x 15, the product (30) could easily be divided by 3

  • The correct answer wasn’t asked for, just the equation

Instructional Implications
  • Draw a strip diagram and/or a picture to represent the scenario

  • Check the answer from your picture against the equation (2 x 15 x 3)

3.3F - 36% overall mastery

represent equivalent fractions with denominators of 2, 3, 4, 6, and 8 using a variety of objects and pictorial models, including number lines


#20 - 36% correct


Analysis
  • This was a previously unseen item type

  • Students had to generate the equivalent fraction first (without a visual) to accurately represent it

  • Two steps are required to select the correct answer

    • Select the correct number of partitions (denominator)

    • Select the correct number of shaded parts (numerator)

Instructional Implications
  • Show students how to generate equivalent fractions by cutting in half

  • Show students how to generate equivalent fractions by grouping in pairs

  • If possible, practice with this item type

3.5E - 45% overall mastery

represent real-world relationships using number pairs in a table and verbal descriptions


#14 - 57% correct


#22 - 33% correct


Analysis
  • Students struggled more with the inline choice (also a verbal description)

  • One was a multiplicative relationship, one was additive (subtractive?)

  • For #14, 26% chose A (Rule = x 2 rather than x 4)

  • #22 was only worth one point

Instructional Implications
  • Spend more time on describing verbal descriptions than finding the rules in a table

  • Once the rule is found, apply it to each number pair to check for accuracy

3.6A - 47% overall mastery

classify and sort two- and three-dimensional figures, including cones, cylinders, spheres, triangular and rectangular prisms, and cubes, based on attributes using formal geometric language


#4 - 17% full credit, 44% partial credit, 38% no credit


#23 - 55% correct


Analysis
  • Neither problem included visuals

  • Both problems included a pyramid (not included, but also not excluded, in the TEKS)

  • For #23, 28% chose A (would be correct for a rectangular pyramid)

Instructional Implications
  • Help students learn to sketch visuals of 3D shapes

  • Discuss the similarities and differences between bases and faces

  • Work with a table to sort by two properties at a time

3.2A - 52% overall mastery

compose and decompose numbers up to 100,000 as a sum of so many ten thousands, so many thousands, so many hundreds, so many tens, and so many ones using objects, pictorial models, and numbers, including expanded notation as appropriate


#25 - 52% correct


Analysis
  • Students might not be as familiar with unit form

  • Both B and D required renaming 40 tens as 4 hundreds

  • 25% chose B (misunderstood 4 in the ten thousands)

Instructional Implications
  • Use a place value chart

  • Practice renaming more than 10 of the same unit, including when there are already some of those units (e.g., 4 hundreds 15 tens as 550)

 
 
 

Recent Posts

See All
August Newsletter | Five Minute Math

August Newsletter Get ready for SY26-27! Every school year brings new opportunities. At Five Minute Math, here are new resources (FREE!!) to help you and your students succeed. TEKS Tools Did you know

 
 
 
TEKS TOOLS [Grade 8]

Since the 2022 STAAR redesign, aka STAAR 2.0, a noted increase in complexity has emerged. Students are asked to think and solve in ways that even cause some adults to pause. Rather than more drill and

 
 
 
Formulas: Linear Relationships [TEKS Tools Grade 8]

This post specifically looks at how formulas can be used solve problems involving linear relationships, including the form y = mx + b. Read more about TEKS Tools and their rationale here. Formulas For

 
 
 

Comments


bottom of page